GeForce GTX has 23% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 3 GB. Both video cards are using PCIe x16 interface connection to a motherboard. GTX Mining Settings (Overclock Settings) · Core Voltage (VDD): N/A · Power Limit (%): ~60% or 75 (W) · Core Clock (CClock): + · Memory Clock. Nvidia GTX can reach MH/s hashrate and 77 W power consumption for mining ETH (Ethash). Find out more hashrate, consumption, difficulty. STUFF TO BUY WITH BITCOINS FREE

The above is something of a best-case scenario for when you'd break even on the cost of a GPU. Actually, that's not true. The best-case scenario for miners is that the price of Ethereum doubles or triples or whatever, and then everyone holding Ethereum makes a bunch of money.

Until people start to cash out and the price drops, triggering panic sells and a plummeting price. That happened in with Ethereum, and it's happened at least three times during the history of Bitcoin. Like we said: volatile. Still, there are obviously plenty of people who believe in the potential of Ethereum, Bitcoin, and blockchain technologies. Even at today's inflated GPU prices with mining profitability slumping, some people are likely still making a go at mining. At least if the value of the coins drops, you still have the hardware that's at least worth something provided the card doesn't prematurely die due to heavy mining use.

That means, despite the overall rankings in terms of time to break even , you're generally better off buying newer hardware if possible. Even when profitability drops, GPU prices tend to take longer to come down. There's also a balance between time to break even and daily potential profits, but at this point we strongly advise against anyone investing more money into GPU mining. Okay, sure, you can try to get ahead of the next wave, whenever that happens if that happens.

For those still interested, we've considered the options and come up with this list of the best mining GPUs for Ethereum right now — things can change rapidly based on pricing and availability, not to mention the valuation of Ethereum and Bitcoin. Make sure you get one of the non-LHR models, though, or mining profitability with Ethereum is a lot lower. The GeForce RTX is also worth a look, provided you can find one of the earlier models where the LHR lock was accidentally broken with older drivers for a good price.

Mining performance is lower but efficiency and break-even time are basically the same as the XT. Just don't get the 4GB models! Of course these could be five years old cards by this point, and buying a used graphics card presents some obvious risks! The RX is generally cheaper than the others and used a bit less power, making it the clear winner. Plus, when you're not mining, it's a very capable gaming GPU.

The time to break even is pretty bad, but if you do get into the black it will end up with the highest profitability from that point forward. View Details. Postby KryptoElektryk » Sun Jun 10, pm. This means your GPU may perform worst or better based on your luck in the hardware.

Please make sure to watch our overclocking basics and benefits video to avoid any unnecessary damage and risk to To calculate your mining efficiency you first need to obtain hashrate and watt values. Once ready simply divide hashrate with number of Watts used The Nvidia GeForce GTX payback period depends on its efficiency hashrate , selling price, and energy consumption.

The energy expenses are not taken into account in the Find out more hashrate, consumption, difficulty, and profitability for mining different coins on algorithms. Specs, price, … Release date and price. Launch price -

LATEST POOL BETTING RESULTS

Please note that the hashrate and power consumption benchmarks listed below were achieved with optimized overclock settings. Additionally, depending on the manufacturer, your results may vary. To achieve similar results, you will need to do your testing to find the best setting for your card. I also want to mention that you may see other reports of higher hashrates with this card, but in most cases, those results are unstable for long term mining stability.

Again results will vary depending on the manufacturer of the card and mining software utilized. Best Coin To Mine With Gtx 6gb When it comes to finding the best coins to mine with the 6GB version, there are several coins to pick and choose from. Back when this card first launched, most miners used this card for mining coins like Zcash.

Here is a list of some of the best coins to currently mine with the GTX 6GB: Ethereum— Ethereum has been a common favorite for a lot of different mining GPUs as it continues to be a top 10 coin to mine still to this day. Ethereum Classic— ETC comes in as a close second of coins to mine with this card as it too is another top 10 coin to mine in Grin— Grin uses a truly unique algorithm called Mimble Wimble and has quickly become a favorite fan coin to mine.

Please note that Grin has different algorithms for different memory types. Therefore the 6GB shows its best performance mining Grin with the Cuckaroom29 version of its algorithm. Beam — Beam is another popular choice to mine with the 6GB. Although it may not be as profitable as mining Eth the project is gaining momentum and appears to be here to stay.

The decentralized, permissionless, composable nature of Ethereum makes it the ideal base layer for the ReFi and solarpunk communities. Through the development of these and others, e. DeSci , Ethereum is becoming an environmentally and socially-positive technology. Ethereum's carbon debt Ethereum's current energy expenditure is very low, but this has not always been the case. Ethereum switched on its proof-of-stake consensus mechanism in Q3 However, Ethereum used a proof-of-work mechanism from , which had a much greater environmental cost.

Since its inception, Ethereum aimed to implement a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, but doing so without sacrificing security and decentralization took years of focused research and development. Therefore, a proof-of-work mechanism was used to get the network started. Proof-of-work consensus requires miners to use their computing hardware to solve a puzzle, expending energy in the process.

The solution to the puzzle proves that energy has been expended by the miner, demonstrating that they invested real-world value for the right to add to the blockchain. Depicted metaphorically, this corresponds to a reduction in emissions from the height of the Eiffel Tower to a small plastic toy figure, as shown in the figure below. Both proof-of-work and proof-of-stake are just mechanisms to decide who gets to add the next block. Swapping proof-of-work for proof-of-stake, where the real-world value invested comes from ETH staked directly in a smart contract, removes the need for miners to burn energy to add to the blockchain.

Therefore, the environmental cost of securing the network is drastically reduced. Why proof-of-stake is greener than proof-of-work Proof-of-work is a robust way to secure the network. Transactions on the Ethereum blockchain under the previous proof-of-work system were validated by miners. Miners bundled together transactions into ordered blocks and added them to the Ethereum blockchain.

The new blocks got broadcast to all the other node operators who run the transactions independently and verify that they are valid. Any dishonesty showed up as an inconsistency between different nodes. Honest blocks were added to the blockchain and became an immutable part of history.

The ability for any miner to add new blocks only works if there is a cost associated with mining and unpredictability about which specific node submits the next block. These conditions are met by imposing proof-of-work. To be eligible to submit a block of transactions, a miner must be the first to submit the solution to a computationally expensive puzzle.

To successfully take control of the blockchain, a dishonest miner would have to consistently win the proof-of-work race by investing in sufficient hardware and energy to outperform the majority of other miners. This mechanism of securing the network is problematic for several reasons. First, miners would increase their odds of success by investing in more powerful hardware, creating conditions for an arms race with miners acquiring increasingly power-hungry mining equipment.

This increased the network's energy consumption and generated hardware waste. Second, Ethereum's proof-of-work protocol prior to transitioning to proof-of-stake had a total annualized power consumption approximately equal to that of Finland 1 and a carbon footprint similar to Switzerland 1. Proof-of-stake uses validators instead of miners. Validators perform the same function as miners, except that instead of expending their assets up-front as energy expenditure, they stake ETH as collateral against dishonest behavior.

This staked ETH can be destroyed if the validator misbehaves, with more severe penalties for more nefarious actions. This strongly incentivizes active and honest participation in securing the network without requiring large energy expenditure.

Since almost all of the energy expended securing the proof-of-work network came from the mining algorithm, the switch to proof-of-stake dramatically reduced energy expenditure. There is also no benefit to be had by investing in more powerful hardware under proof-of-stake, so there is no arms-race condition and less electronic waste.

1060 power consumption ethereum bet on win

GeForce 10 Series 5x GPUs (Power Consumption Comparison)

Other materials on the topic

Bitcoin mining rate

Where can you buy cryptocurrency

Tsm betting software for sale

Lmdz gcm forex